Google+ Changes; Apple Apps Hit 50B Downloads and Some Aren’t Happy

Apple has lots of real cash but, not for you.

Apple has lots of real cash but, not for you.

If you haven’t been over to your Google+ page recently, there are big changes. The page is now filled with info boxes that show everything from streams to potential people you may know. The left-side menu is now hidden unless you hover over the “Home” link at top left. Overall, it looks pleasing.

It appears the changes were made and launched to coincide with the Google I/O developer’s conference happening this week. Entrepreneur has written a decent summary of the changes. You can check it out here. One thing that hasn’t changed – when I go to my Google+ page, it still annoyingly takes me to another page first. It repeatedly wants me to add friends and suggests me doing so before I can go to my Google+ page. This happens practically every single time. Now I know Google wants desperately to grow its social network. However, one would think if a user clicked to not add anyone more than a dozen times it would be better to not pester users about it anymore. It just reinforces how it’s all about their interest rather than user experience.

Apple Hits Another Big Milestone
Apple hasn’t been the same Wall Street darling this year compared to previous years. But, that hasn’t stopped it from reaching another big milestone. Apple recently surpassed 50 billion app downloads. While my guess is 40 billion are rarely used, it’s still impressive. What seemed to not impress people is the PR stunt Apple did to commemorate the event. Apple apparently offered $10,000 in app store cash to the person that would be the downloader of the 50 billionth app. It would seem that getting $10,000 for clicking a couple of buttons would be good but, not like this. As is pointed out here, the fact you have to spend the $10,000 on more apps as a reward for helping get Apple to such a milestone comes across as self-serving. When this happens – and you also happen to be the one tech company with the most money in the bank (billions) – well, it is self-serving. At the very least, Apple should have made it a gift card to the Apple store, not the iTunes store. Even better would have been a Visa gift card to use anywhere. In addition, the fact it is only offering $10,000 when it has billions laying around is also cheap. Coming across “cheap” when popular perception about its products is that they are anti-cheap (in price or quality) is a poor PR stunt.

Now I’m sure not everyone perceived the $10,000 app store reward so negatively. But, why not make sure no one did? Apple is a company in a rare position – it has too much cash on hand for Wall Street’s liking. So, it recently decided to give back $100 billion to shareholders. To do so, it apparently also plans to even borrow money to pay it out. When Apple is willing to do this for shareholders such a small reward for consumers can seem insulting. This is especially true when it was consumers in the first place – not Wall Street – that helped get Apple the success it has achieved. Apple, really? The company will borrow $100 billion to give back to shareholders – the company is willing to do that much for Wall Street. But, for consumers that helped the company surpass a monumental 50 billion app downloads, it cannot even muster a real cash reward? For consumers that got the company to this big achievement – again, not Wall Street – the company chooses to reward them with $10,000 TO BUY MORE APPS. Apple has pulled off some great PR moves over the past several years. Mark this one as not so impressive.

Mixed Microsoft Messaging Muddles its Market

Windows 8 PR team could learn from Xbox PR team

Microsoft’s Win8 could follow Xbox’s lead for proper product launch details

Microsoft is in the news again this week with some more details about Windows Blue and how this upgrade to Windows 8 may or may not help. The reason it may or may not help is because Microsoft continues to be pretty secretive about the upgrade so, it’s really unknown if it will help. Rumors then continue to swirl, guesses are being made, and more.

Tech PR Review previously posted that Microsoft should become more proactive about publicly announcing its plans. In particular, it should address whether or not it will bring back the start menu and a boot-to-desktop option. These are two features heavily covered in a negative light across media and blogs. In a Microsoft blog post May 7, Microsoft remained vague. One sentence read, “The Windows Blue update is also an opportunity for us to respond to the customer feedback that we’ve been closely listening to since the launch of Windows 8 and Windows RT.” That’s as far as it went – there appeared to be no specifics.

Prior to this, CNET published a story with a sub-headline that stated “…the software giant is ready to fire up the Windows Blue disclosure machine…” Clearly that didn’t mean right away since the disclosure machine was not apparent in the Microsoft blog post the next day. The story did state details would start to emerge in the next couple of weeks. If Microsoft is trying to generate additional press before the two weeks, it’s a good thought. But, the problem is it probably means two more weeks of rumors and negativity. Just today, in another CNET story, a Microsoft executive hinted at the possibility of bringing back the start button. Here’s a summary:

Julie Larson-Green, corporate vice president of Windows at Microsoft, said the company is having “meaningful discussions” about bringing certain older features of the Microsoft’s operating system to Windows 8. That could include a Start button that remains on the screen.

However, she said Microsoft believes “fully in the start screen and model of having live tiles and access to everything you want in a glance.”

So again, it’s not clear. In fact, the reference to belief in the start screen could even imply there will not be a boot-to-desktop option. Vagueness like this is the problem with keeping things hush for so long. There are essentially four camps of Windows 8 consumers. There are those that have Windows 8 and are happy with it. Clearly there are not enough of these people as the OS is nowhere near the installed base of Windows 7 or XP. It may be selling OK, according to Microsoft, but it has a long way to go. Then there are those that have Windows 8 and want changes – the biggest requests being a start button and boot-to-desktop option. Microsoft’s continued secrecy on this is probably frustrating these users. Even if their wishes are granted, the frustration was real and long. It lingers and is never forgotten. This leaves a potential bad taste in the mouth for future Microsoft OS products. Then there are those that don’t have Windows 8 because they are waiting – waiting to see what happens with the update or probably with Intel’s newest chips due out soon. These people watching and waiting on the sidelines also feel the frustration (will the OS be good for me when I’m ready?). Finally, there are those that don’t have Windows 8 because they are not Windows users or dislike Microsoft. Microsoft is giving these folks plenty of fuel – and time – to create word-of-mouth that is anti-Windows and anti-Microsoft.

In short, Microsoft’s secretive approach to PR is kindling a bad fire. Perhaps Microsoft is being secretive to not let the competition get a jump. Well, Microsoft should offer this explanation – there are plenty of people out there that don’t know this. Perhaps Microsoft thinks this explanation will fuel bad publicity. I think it wouldn’t be worse than it is. Maybe Microsoft is unsure if it can deliver a start button or boot-to-desktop mode. Well, if so, Microsoft better be prepared for even harsher backlash. It basically must do it.

On May 21, Microsoft will announce the next version of its market-leading Xbox game console. It has sent out all the media invites for the event. The console itself is not expected to be available until around November, almost a half year later. It’s likely to be an event filled with critical details about it. It may leave out certain technical specifications or other low-level intricacies but, when it comes to key features for potential consumers, I doubt Microsoft will spare a word. But, with Windows 8, it doesn’t take the same approach. I just don’t get it.

The New Xbox Name + Even Lady Gaga Can’t Help a Bad Product

celebrity endorsed controller

Celebrity singing doesn’t make it innovative or good.

With around a month to go until Microsoft announces the new Xbox, rumors are swirling about its name. The latest appears to be the Xbox Infinity. Why not Xbox 3? Well, this goes back a bit.

If my history is correct, the original Xbox launched to compete against the PS2. Enter the next – and current – generation consoles. Sony had its name – the PS3 was an obvious name. But, there was a popular belief then that Microsoft didn’t want to follow with Xbox 2. This is because of Xbox 2 sounding as if it were behind a generation to the PS3. Sounds reasonable enough. So, Microsoft instead went with Xbox 360. Now they have the task of always coming up with a new, and almost always too lengthy, Xbox name rather than just a chronological number behind it.

Microsoft could have been crafty during the Xbox 360′s lifecycle. Maybe the company should have made a different model for the Xbox 360 with a new name. What I mean is Microsoft could have considered something like an Xbox 360 slim version. It could have had similar primary technical specifications as the Xbox 360. However, the smaller version would have allowed a name change. They could have then named it the Xbox 3. They could have even marketed it as being the same as Xbox 360 but leaving out the “60″ because it’s smaller. Clever, ey. ;-) Instead of calling it the 360 slim version (like Sony did for its smaller version of the PS3 – PS3 Slim), the Xbox 3 could have been born. This would’ve then setup the naming of their next console – to be announced this month – to be Xbox 4. And, they would now be on par with the PS4 in terms of chronology. If they then announce a slim of the Xbox 4, they could call it Xbox 4 slim and not Xbox 5. There’s no need to explain all these names to the media as obvious is obvious. While it’s too late for the Xbox 360, perhaps a slim version of the so-called Xbox Infinity will be named the Xbox 4. This way when yet another console is due out it can be the Xbox 5 to compete alongside the PS5.

It’s most likely most people won’t call the console Xbox Infinity – too much of a mouthful. It’ll be shortened to just Xbox. So, somehow laying the foundation to change to a single number would be good overall.

Lady Gaga Can’t Save You
Microsoft better hope the Xbox Infinity isn’t a dud. And, Sony better hope the PS4 isn’t a dud either. If so, it seems neither company will be able to call on Lady Gaga to endorse a bail out. Apparently, Troy Carter – who is Lady Gaga’s manager – recently shared his view that celebrity endorsements can’t save a poor product. This is obvious – no PR or marketing can save a poor product. Innovation is the driving force to success for a product. If it’s poor, go back and innovate it. Then PR and marketing can really make it shine.

Lots of companies also try and advertise a product to success and this is also almost always a mistake. The formula for just about any tech company (and most other industries) is innovation, followed by PR. Then marketing and advertising enter to sustain innovation and PR successes. Getting Lady Gaga to sing a song about your bad product isn’t going to make it good. Neither is PR, an ad, or any other marketing effort. Start with a good product. Support its market presence with good PR that is followed by marketing and advertising to reinforce it all.

Subscribe to RSS Feed Follow Tech PR Review on Twitter!